Legal AI has a data problem before it has an interface problem. If a model quotes a case that does not exist, the interface does not matter. ilovelawyer's Legal Terminal is interesting for what it does underneath, and for how it presents it.
ilovelawyer says every quoted authority is verified against a real source document, a step intended to reduce hallucinated citations. In the consultation view, related case law appears beside a streaming answer with title, citation number, source link and excerpt, and vetted citations are marked. A contradiction scan also flags inconsistencies across a case's documents and testimony.
The platform runs as two sites with different source material:
The UK build searches public sources live, while the Philippine build leans on a statutory code library. The difference matters for anyone judging how fresh the answers are.